|
Press coverage appearing in Defense
News Quarterly Report :
Divergent Groups View
U.S. Security in New Way:
Unique Exercise Assesses
Impact Of Global Issues
[4 December 2000]
By ROBERT HOLZER, Defense News Staff Writer
NEWPORT, R.I.--Analysts with the Naval War College here
have developed a new type of 21st century war game that brings divergent groups
of experts together to assess global issues that will affect U.S. national
security in coming decades.
Called NewRuleSets.Project, the effort is envisioned
as a two-year effort by the Decision Strategies Department at the college to
hold five workshops assessing an economic topic deemed to hold future national
security implications, officials said.
"We like to emphasize that it is a different approach to
explaining issues--it is much more than a war game," said Lawrence Modisett,
chairman of the Decision Strategies Department.
Two workshops, one on the future of energy in Asia and the
other on the implications of direct foreign investment in nations' economies,
have been held to date, officials said. The findings of these workshops are
considered so important that they will be presented to the National Intelligence
Council in Washington during a special session Dec. 6, officials here said.
The council is composed of experts from throughout the
intelligence community who have detailed knowledge on geographic regions and
thematic international issues, such as weapons proliferation.
"The more people who see the brief, the more the interest
[in the project] seems to grow," said Modisett.
What makes the NewRuleSets.Project so different, and
enables alternative conclusions to be reached, lies in the diverse set of
participants who play in each game [see box below], college officials said.
"It is
essential that these two worlds--
military and financial--come to better
understand their interrelationships
across the global economy."
Thomas Barnett
Project director
For example, in the Asian energy game there
were representatives from Wall Street investment firms, executives from energy
companies, military officers and regional experts. This rich mix of expertise
produces the differing slant on the issues under discussion, officials said.
"That is the most unusual thing--drawing
together a group of disparate officials and keeping them at the table," said
Rear Adm. Michael McDevitt, director of the Center for Strategic Studies at the
Center for Naval Analyses, Alexandria, Va., and a participant in one of the
exercises. "It is an intriguing way to get at the issue of predicting the
future."
The Naval War College conducts the exercises
in collaboration with the New York-based bond brokerage firm of Cantor
Fitzgerald, which recruits participants from the financial world and supplies
the meeting room in the World Trade Center building, officials said.
The exercises more clearly demonstrate the
increasing link between economic security and national security, exercise
developers said, even though the topics might not, as first look, appear so
related.
"In the end, the military and financial
markets are in the same business: the effective processing of risk," said Thomas
Barnett, the project's director. "As such, it is essential that these two
worlds--military and financial--come to better understand their
interrelationships across the global economy."
In the Asian energy exercise, for example, the
most salient point to emerge from the day-long discussion is that environmental
security, as a byproduct of the search by Asian nations to use energy
differently, could emerge as a serious issue in the 21st century, according to
Barnett.
"In short, the subject of environmental stress
will become part and parcel of international security debates in the 21st
century, and Asian economic growth will drive much of this discussion," Barnett
said.
Other energy issues unearthed during the
exercise are that the choices that China and India make in terms of the type of
energy they seek to emphasize will have enormous implications for the region,
world economic impact and ultimately U.S. national security policy, Barnett
said. Moreover, U.S. dependence on oil from the Persian Gulf will continue to
wane while it increased for nations in Asia.
This means that U.S. protection of oil coming
from the gulf region will transform into a global economic issue rather than
than a national economic issues as is now the case, Barnett said.
"We
like to emphasize that is is
a different approach to explaining
issues--it is much more than a
war game."
Lawrence Modisett
Naval War College
Decision Strategies Deparment
Issues such as trade and energy "don't seem to
hold the same weight as 10 or 15 years ago, and how the military factors into
these is increasingly significant," he said. Bringing participants from many
backgrounds allows the link between national security and economic issues to
emerge and be addressed.
In addition to the events held on Asian energy
and direct foreign investment, other exercises are being planned to assess
international security implications that might arise from such topics as
infrastructure protection, food and water, and demographics and the environment,
Barnett said.
The NewRuleSets.Project "does seem to
light a lot of fire under people. This creates a dialogue that many people
think is painfully lacking," he said.
The
Players
NewRuleSets.Project challenges the
traditional way of doing war games, bringing together participants from
diverse fields. The U.S. Naval War College, Newport, R.I., recently held an
exercise to assess Asian energy futures and their impact on U.S. national
security. The participating groups were:
FOREIGN POLICY
- National Intelligence Council
- National Security Council
- U.S. Agency for International Development
MILITARY
- Center for Naval Warfare Studies
- Undersecretary of the Navy
- U.S. Naval War College
- U.S. Pacific Command
ENERGY
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Caithness Energy
- Cambridge Energy Research Associates
FINANCIAL
- Cantor Fitzgerald
- eSpeed
- Morgan Stanley Dean Witter
- New York Mercantile Exchange
- Poten Partners
- Sino-American Development Corp.
RESEARCH
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- Institute for International Economics
- National Defense University
- Columbia University
- University of Mississippi
Source: NewRuleSets.Project
DEFENSE NEWS/Nathaniel Levine |
|