« Yes, the Balkan interventions did lead to connectivity | Main | The dangers of disconnectedness on display »

Why Saddam's trial in Iraq is a mistake

"Lawyer for Saddam official killed: 2nd defense attorney slain before trial," by Rick Jervis, USA Today, 9 November 2005, p. 1A.
It's not just the assassinations of the legal personnel involved. It's that this entire trial should be about building case law for the A-to-Z rule set for processing politically bankrupt states.

It's not about making Iraqis feel good or bad anymore, or getting brave people killed. It's about making the world a better place.


Saddam should be on trial in the ICC. Doesn't matter the hassle. Doesn't matter what bad things might be exposed about our intervention or occupation.


You want to use the Leviathan, you have to submit to the global rule set. We set that process in motion, getting a lot of authorship in the process (meaning, getting our way), or that process is imposed on us, and we won't like the outcome.

Post a comment

Comments must adhere to the comment policy. All TypeKey comments will post immediately (but are still subject to moderation) All other comments must wait for moderation before they publish. Please also read How to write so Tom will post/reply.

'Development-in-a-Box' is a registered trademark of Enterra Solutions.

Buy Tom's books online









About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on November 10, 2005 6:52 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Yes, the Balkan interventions did lead to connectivity.

The next post in this blog is The dangers of disconnectedness on display.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.