« Comment upgrade on Esquire-Egypt thread | Main | Beautiful day for some football »

No future for the NAM

Columnist Rich Tucker quotes Tom extensively in the back half of Draining the “Legion of Doom’s” Swamp:

But the U.S. military’s probably the only force in the world that can actually help Cuba. As Thomas Barnett wrote in his book The Pentagon’s New Map, “Show me a part of the world that is secure in its peace and I will show you strong or growing ties between local militaries and the U.S. military. Show me regions where major war is inconceivable and I will show you permanent U.S. military bases and long-term security alliances.”


Barnett adds that the opposite is also true. “Where America’s security exports have been hesitant, intermittent, or nonexistent, there you will find most of the violence in the world today,” which we certainly do in Myanmar, Zimbabwe, Sudan, etc.


Of course, the peace delivered by the American military also delivers prosperity. For example, while most North Koreas are starving, South Korea (under our security umbrella) has developed one of the most dynamic economies in the world.


And once a country has a successful economy, it’s unlikely to resort to violence. “Of the 37 major conflicts spread around the world I the 1990s, 34 occurred in countries with annual per capita GDP totals of less than $2,936,” Barnett writes. “When countries rise above that $3,000 mark, they seem to get out of the mass violence business.” Thus, global prosperity -- spread and encouraged by the U.S. military -- is the real key to “killing transnational terrorism,” as Barnett writes.


There’s a world worth creating out there.


We won’t get there as long as some leaders in the Nonaligned Movement cling to power, but their world is the past, not the future.

Comments (3)

Absolutely can not wait to see who is elected to replace Annan...

Robert

Here's some interesting commentary on nuclear proliferation as an op-ed piece in today's Boston Globe. Long on reflection, short on solution sets.

Lost chances to contain nuclear arms
By Joseph Cirincione | September 18, 2006
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2006/09/18/lost_chances_to_contain_nuclear_arms/

http://stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=40099
Good article on the work that we beginning to do in Africa and also the mistakes that we have made. It’s fascinating that the Tanzanian people are upset with us after the Embassy bombing since 1. It was locals that were killed and 2. Afterwards we shut ourselves of from the people.

“To me, it continues to now — the Americans are so worried about terrorism that they separate themselves from the people. Here, Kenya, Iraq, wherever they are.”

So it’s not withdraw that soothes the people but engagement.
Just as last century was focused on Europe this century has to focus on Africa.

Post a comment

Comments must adhere to the comment policy. All TypeKey comments will post immediately (but are still subject to moderation) All other comments must wait for moderation before they publish. Please also read How to write so Tom will post/reply.

'Development-in-a-Box' is a registered trademark of Enterra Solutions.

Buy Tom's books online









About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on September 16, 2006 6:27 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Comment upgrade on Esquire-Egypt thread.

The next post in this blog is Beautiful day for some football.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.