« Great piece on Iran’s economic collapse, despite all the oil wealth | Main | Kurdistan's resilience personified »

Connectivity at the price of content control

ARTICLE: “Bhutan Lets the World In (but Leaves Fashion TV Out),” by Somini Sengupta, New York Times, 6 May 2007, p. A3.

Doesn’t get anymore old school PNM than this: Bhutan is the most Gappish of states in that it’s tough terrain and landlocked. Moreover, a culture that “had guarded itself from the world outside so ardently that it allowed in satellite television only seven years ago.”

But “today, globalization is officially sanctioned,” so our Mr. Wangchuk can scan tattoo sites (strict taboo) for his next self-inflicted design.

Hmmm. Don’t think keeping out Stella McCartney and Donna Karan is going to do it here.

This is classic: I trade the connectivity for content control. The more I connect, the more I try to control, citing traditional taboos. The worst offenders are my youth (damn them!). I fear I’m waging a losing battle and over time I’ll mostly retreat to restricting criticism of the regime, because I can’t stop all the sex stuff no matter how hard I try. I’m distinctly getting the feeling that the cat will never go back into the bag. But I feel like I have no choice. My youth population is large, it’s getting more educated, and everyone talks about How can we attract jobs and investment to employ them all? So I don’t feel like I can restrict the Internet or other forms of connectivity, because without them no one will do business here or bring money. So I fear I’m trading off a lot of my distinct culture for economic opportunity, and that makes me nervous. Already, certain hardliners are making scary noises …

And so on.

Yes, yes, everything changed when the [insert technology/infrastructure] came to town.

Comments (4)

"Already, certain hardliners are making scary noises …"

Well...if you have to deal with hardliners, you can't get any better than Buddhist theocratic hardliners. They tend not to blow other people up with car bombs or invade neighboring states. At worst, they protest by burning themselves to death.

Mark, everyone knows you're biased when it comes to Buddhism ;-)

Except there have been militant Buddhists in Sri Lanka and Burma.

"Except there have been militant Buddhists in Sri Lanka and Burma."

Neither have anything on the martial ferocity of the Zen Buddhist monks of pre-Tokugawa Japan. Mostly though, Buddhism dilutes the warrior element present in a national culture as it did with the Tibetans and Mongols and, to a lesser extent, the Chinese.

Post a comment

Comments must adhere to the comment policy. All TypeKey comments will post immediately (but are still subject to moderation) All other comments must wait for moderation before they publish. Please also read How to write so Tom will post/reply.

'Development-in-a-Box' is a registered trademark of Enterra Solutions.

Buy Tom's books online









About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on May 11, 2007 11:47 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Great piece on Iran’s economic collapse, despite all the oil wealth.

The next post in this blog is Kurdistan's resilience personified.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.31