« Duh! Where we engage the enemy, they seem to attack more! In their preferred way! | Main | On inclusion in the marketplace, follow the money »

Good news for Hillary, bad from Rudy

ARTICLE: "Handicapping With Optimism," by Benedict Carey, New York Times, 1 May 2007, p. A21.

The more optimistic candidate wins 80 percent of the time since 1900.

A measuring system from academics says Hillary is most optimistic (the Bill influence), then Obama. McCain, Romney, Edwards and Giuliani.

But frankly she's the only one who skews heavy to optimism.

Not sure on how they measure (based on words uttered versus delivery), because I think Rudy and Barack deliver optimistically, as does Romney, even if words don't indicate as much.

Still, I'm a big believer on this--naturally.

Comments (1)

I've been saying this for ages. I'm glad to see some candidates picking up the point. It makes perfect sense, too. If the candidate doesn't act as though things will get better after he or she is elected, why should the voters think any differently?

Post a comment

Comments must adhere to the comment policy. All TypeKey comments will post immediately (but are still subject to moderation) All other comments must wait for moderation before they publish. Please also read How to write so Tom will post/reply.

'Development-in-a-Box' is a registered trademark of Enterra Solutions.

Buy Tom's books online









About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on May 5, 2007 9:17 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Duh! Where we engage the enemy, they seem to attack more! In their preferred way!.

The next post in this blog is On inclusion in the marketplace, follow the money.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.31