« 1Sigma SysAdmin solutions | Main | This week's column »

You call those 'incidents'?

WEBSITE: Global Incident Map

This thing seems an exercise in self-absorption: suspicious package at a Home Depot here and a guy arrested outside Obama's hotel there, foiled plots and cells discovered, but gloriously quiet Sudan doesn't rate a notation and Mugabe's ongoing terror against his people doesn't rank a star in Zimbabwe.

Our "suspicious events" in the Core naturally trump an ongoing genocide in the Gap. This is strategic hypochondria. You look at this map and see a Core "awash" in terror, seemingly engulfed in fear, with threats peaking around every corner. Meanwhile, placid Africa is clearly the place to be--hardly any terror to speak of!

The density of connectivity in the Core and the surrounding security naturally generate a flood of "abnormal" events that must be checked out, whereas in much of the Gap, ongoing failures, breakdowns and a certain base level of snafus and criminality are taken as the norm.

The profound difference between the Core and the Gap on such issues are on display right now between the Old Core and New Core China. The kind of "scandals" China suddenly encounters because of its supply chain connectivity to the Old Core is stuff China would have simply swept under the rug back home in previous times (I mean, big deal! A bunch of people get poisoned!). But because the Old Core has much higher standards, once China is connected it suddenly finds itself held to those higher standards, and all sorts of stuff previously blown off is now a scandal or worse.

That was my primary reason in defining the Core-Gap breakdown in the first place: the Core has all sorts of rule sets, the Gap largely lacks them. So everything out of the very tightly defined norm is a "crime," or "terrorism" or a "crisis" in the Core, while all sorts of stuff goes on constantly in the Gap that doesn't raise the Core's interest much at all (again, how can my "nightmare scenario" for bioterror in the Core possibly be compared to an ongoing war somewhere inside the Gap?). Almost anything trips the wire in the Core, while virtually nothing does so inside the Gap.

So naturally, we're the ones trapped in a climate of unending fear.

Inside the Gap you're lucky to make it to 50. Inside the Core you live with the terror of learning through genetic analysis exactly what could kill you in your sixties versus your seventies. We do have it tough.

Thanks to Robert Langland for sending this.

Comments (2)

Another skin.

Actually, that life expectancy of 50 seems to be a pretty significant number for some reason. If you look at African countries where the life expectancy is greater than 50, they seem to have a whole lot of other good things going on compared to countries where the life expectancy is less than 50.

If I were talking to people who were thinking of investing in the Gap, life expectancy is the first statistic that I would suggest that they look for as a way to narrow down their search and increase their chances of success.

Of course, if that ever becomes widely known as a measuring stick for investment, expect the life expectancy statistics to be dummied up by kleptocratic government officials hoping for a piece of any new investments just as surely as East European factory managers used to falsify production statistics in order to make their numbers.

Post a comment

Comments must adhere to the comment policy. All TypeKey comments will post immediately (but are still subject to moderation) All other comments must wait for moderation before they publish. Please also read How to write so Tom will post/reply.

'Development-in-a-Box' is a registered trademark of Enterra Solutions.

Buy Tom's books online









About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on July 7, 2007 7:37 PM.

The previous post in this blog was 1Sigma SysAdmin solutions.

The next post in this blog is This week's column.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.