« Israel’s future isn’t South Africa, its denouement is South Africa | Main | Furreigners not welcome! »

Why a cleaner China is likely a more centralized China

ARTICLE: “Beijing Seeks Energy Cuts; Localities Find Loopholes,” by Howard W. French, New York Times, 24 November 2007, p. A1.

The center decrees the need for greater fuel efficiency and cleaner sources/uses, and the provinces, turned loose under Deng’s mantra of getting rich is good, simply ignore the directives.

This is a microcosm of the global pollution problems: in aggregate, everyone sees the needs to address, but locally, people just want to get by and get rich.

So the push for green will be a strengthening of the center in China, not its weakening. Counterintuitive to some, but less so for students of Chinese history.

Fascinating map on the jump page: most efficient energy users are the coastal provinces from Beijing down to Guangdong. The middling are those just inside that band. The worst are the inner-most, interior rural provinces. It’s like Core/Seam/Gap all inside China, in environmental terms.

Comments (1)

you have encapsuled the the history of china

a continuing struggle to gain power over the coastal provinces, to extend power into the middle of the country, and then to extend power to the remote ruler areas of the far interior

our domestic energy process presents a well-known and well-documented global environment coal-burning problem and china's energy process presents another one

despite extensive health issues caused by burning coal for electricity the us does not acknowledge a need to change

china which is much more dependent on coal will not act until the us resolves its coal problem

the coal problem is like the opium problem

how do you change horses in midstream

why would you give up your $


we have a coal problem and china has

Post a comment

Comments must adhere to the comment policy. All TypeKey comments will post immediately (but are still subject to moderation) All other comments must wait for moderation before they publish. Please also read How to write so Tom will post/reply.

'Development-in-a-Box' is a registered trademark of Enterra Solutions.

Buy Tom's books online









About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on December 21, 2007 7:00 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Israel’s future isn’t South Africa, its denouement is South Africa.

The next post in this blog is Furreigners not welcome!.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.