ARTICLE: U.S. Steps Up Unilateral Strikes in Pakistan, By Robin Wright and Joby Warrick, Washington Post, March 27, 2008; Page A01
Scary combination: we step up unilateral strikes inside another nation because we fear their new leadership will back away from such commitments. Does that sound sustainable to you?




Comments (8)
Is my memory failing or do Cambodia and Lao ring a bell? What does Congress say about this development? Is there authority for these actions in the Congressional resolutions and UN actions authorizing or ratifying US actions in Afghanistan and Iraq? Is this the Pentagon's New Map?
Posted by William R. Cumming | March 28, 2008 9:21 AM
Dr Barnett. Don't you think its past time we stopped pretending that the tribal areas belong to a soverign nation?
Posted by Dirk | March 28, 2008 9:28 AM
Congress? Congress? That sounds vaguely familiar. Did we not have something called congress in our past? I am sure we did. Well, we don't need it now anyway. We have unmanned drones instead.
Posted by Ted O'Connor | March 28, 2008 12:44 PM
No, it does not.
Posted by Hans Suter | March 28, 2008 1:27 PM
Sometimes the silence of a Democratic Congress on a Republican Executive issue speaks volumes.
Posted by Louis Heberlein | March 28, 2008 2:11 PM
it seems,before Bush dances out of the office,he will have to do the
realigment dance.of course,you can't have to much hope that he won't stumble,even though his trainer is Kissenger.the hard reality is so,that he won't have a choice but try to do the right dance,the
pragmatic one,the big dance of his presidency;to engage Iran. that
is the one dance which will satisfy the Iranian regional power interest,and elimnate a lot of Bush's problems in the middle east.the
Iranian people of course don't like this regime,but thier independence come first.
Posted by farhad | March 28, 2008 7:46 PM
Pakistan's leaders have more to lose than we do. They may be persuadable to provide at least a fig leaf (say, leadership of a joint operation where we provide much of the firepower and expertise). If not . . .
At some point, the leaders of the US, Pakistan, Afganistan and the Waziri Pashtun tribes on both sides of the Durand line need to sit down in the same place and refuse to leave until a deal is hashed out. A deal no-one may be too pleased with.
Posted by Michael
|
March 28, 2008 8:10 PM
How does this differ from what obama wants to do?
Posted by vinit joshi | March 30, 2008 1:49 PM