« Wrong choice on missile defense v. NATO expansion | Main | This week's column »

Big decisions on the book

I decided to cut Part IV completely, giving me only three parts now renamed. I had ditched Chapter 12 (Super-Empower Me!) and moved it up into an earlier chapter as a section, and Thursday, just back from Amsterdam, I decided to kill Chapter 13 (How to Become a Grand Strategist). I had spent the flights there and back prepping the chapter, and felt okay about it starting out, but then I found I simply couldn't write my way into the chapter well. I cranked 1500 words and hadn't even started the chapter and when I looked at the material, it struck me like the beginning of a conclusion, not the start of another substantive chapter. I thereupon still tried to start the How To chapter and did about 1,000, but the tone and the level was all wrong, plus I felt like I was regurgitating material from the first chapter, which I now realize has covered the same material, just at a much higher level. Since the entire book resides at that higher level, I felt I couldn't downshift to a self-help tone at the end. It would just be too weird.

Mark and I have decided I'll probably write that as a piece for Esquire later this year, maybe as an ad for a small, Robert Kagan-like book just on that subject, which would be fun (resurrecting my original book proposal).

I don't feel bad about dropping the entire last part. It just makes sense. Chapter 11 felt like such a concluding substantive chapter: I had said what I set out to say.

Plus I'm so happy with the whole book, which I reread yesterday on flights to and from DC, that I don't want to ruin the strong tone by add-ons.

So today I work up the conclusion, which I will write tomorrow. Then I will break for a week and think about the Preface, based on the new title for the book, which is, Great Powers: America and the World After Bush. The title is mostly Neil's creation, but I like it a lot. I like the idea of recasting that classic term of art in this book, for I feel that is exactly what I've done in the text.

Comments (4)

I'm eagerly awaiting the book's release. I'm sure everything will turn out for the best. The title is nice, but the subtitle is rather provocative, don't you think? At least will get people to pick up the book, and then hopefully buy it! However, I'd buy it just seeing that it's by you. "Brought to you by the author of Pentagon's New Map." That's all you really need to say!

I can't wait!!

Sounds great, Dr. Barnett. The title is alluring ...

Even for a fan and student of yours (when time permits), it is hard to imagine what this new book will include that has not already been covered in your previous power point briefs and books.

It seems ironic for such a huge topic to say that ...
often, less is more.

I was looking forward to the "How to..." part. How about a "Grand Strategy For Dummies"?

There is an extensive primer up front on grand strategy. Having done that (15,000 words), I just felt it would be too repetitive to do the career advice stuff, and too narrow an ending.

I will write this up for Mark and the mag, so I don't think the "How to" bit will die. I just need a different venue to do it up right.

Post a comment

Comments must adhere to the comment policy. All TypeKey comments will post immediately (but are still subject to moderation) All other comments must wait for moderation before they publish. Please also read How to write so Tom will post/reply.

'Development-in-a-Box' is a registered trademark of Enterra Solutions.

Buy Tom's books online









About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on April 19, 2008 8:55 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Wrong choice on missile defense v. NATO expansion.

The next post in this blog is This week's column.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.