« Better for America that Petraeus does CENTCOM instead of EUCOM | Main | Unacceptable answer from Petraeus »
Research Publication No. 2008-01: Mapping Iran’s Online Public: Politics and Culture in the Persian Blogosphere, April 6, 2008, The Berkman Center for Internet & Society at the Harvard Law School
Good example of why I'm not into "strategic comms": the best peer influencers are fellow peers, not some outside government.
(Thanks: Patrick O'Connor)
This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on April 24, 2008 6:13 AM.
The previous post in this blog was Better for America that Petraeus does CENTCOM instead of EUCOM.
The next post in this blog is Unacceptable answer from Petraeus.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
Comments (2)
Tom,
Can you delve into your thoughts on why you are not "into strategic comms?" I understand what you're saying, however, just looking for a bit more fiedlity.
Posted by Matt | April 24, 2008 8:42 AM
Matt: one post from the past that addresses your question:
Milblogs all the strategic comms we need
to wit: in our current world, we need more transparency, hence milblogs. they communicate better, more authentically than any intentional strategic comms ever could. delusional, paranoid worries about jeopardizing opsec do not compare with the positive PR our nation and the military services totally need.
Posted by Sean Meade![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.thomaspmbarnett.com/weblog/nav-commenters.gif)
|
April 24, 2008 12:00 PM