« ZenPundit's 1st of 8 posts on System Perturbation rules | Main | After a long hard day, it doesn't get any better than this ... »

ZenPundit analyzes the System Perturbation Rule Set

Dateline: above the garage in Portsmouth RI, 12 December 2004

Waiting a while to re-post this huge chunk of analysis from Mark Safranski, aka Zenpundit, on the "deleted scene" which is the missing section from PNM. This section was cut by my editor Mark Warren for being both too hard and seemingly esoteric. It was, I realized, a bridge too far in PNM, and yet, I consider it some of my best work.

To read about the deleted scene and to read the section itself in full, go here.

This is going to be a mega-posting series well in excess of 10,000 words. I am going to re-post all of Mark's individual posts, appending my short commentary behind each. Obviously, this material is primarily designed for those who really want to drill down on the System Perturbation concept. I post it all here simply to keep my historical record on Mark's very intriguing analysis of PNM complete.

ZenPundit's 1st of 8 posts on System Perturbation rules

ZenPundit's 2nd of 8 posts on System Perturbation rules

ZenPundit's 3rd of 8 posts on System Perturbation rules

ZenPundit's 4th of 8 posts on System Perturbation rules

ZenPundit's 5th of 8 posts on System Perturbation rules

ZenPundit's 6th of 8 posts on System Perturbation rules

ZenPundit's 7th of 8 posts on System Perturbation rules

ZenPundit's 8th of 8 posts on System Perturbation rules





Email this post

Email this post to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


« ZenPundit's 1st of 8 posts on System Perturbation rules | Main | After a long hard day, it doesn't get any better than this ... »