« Zarqawi is gone, but there will be others--and that is only natural in this Long War | Main | Larry's 'brilliant friend, Tom' »

Network resiliency - for good and bad

Mark Safranski (ZenPundit) has a major post on the resiliency of networks and how it can be both a good and bad thing. Partisan political networks, for example, need to be less resilient if they are going to be open to outside information. The resiliency of networks can work for godd when we can form connections across typical (party, in the example) lines. Mark closes his post with Tom's mantra 'Disconnectedness defines danger'.

Steve DeAngelis picks up on Marks post with his Network Resiliency -- Good or Bad?. Steve's not as 'sanguine' as Mark. But he's in the business of making connections and wants to find the 'straddlers' and support them.


Comments

"Partisan political networks, for example, need to be less resilient if they are going to be open to outside information."

Emphasis is mine.

Hmmm... seems counter intuitive to me. I better read it again before I comment :-)


Post a comment

Unregistered comments must wait for approval. All comments must adhere to the comment policy.




Email this post

Email this post to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


« Zarqawi is gone, but there will be others--and that is only natural in this Long War | Main | Larry's 'brilliant friend, Tom' »